[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f8efc961-2fbe-496b-93d2-55f9072bd08c@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 17:46:19 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
Cc: jassisinghbrar@...il.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org,
manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] mailbox: tmelite-qmp: Introduce TMEL QMP mailbox
driver
On 4.03.2025 10:46 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 10:33, Sricharan Ramabadhran
> <quic_srichara@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/3/2025 6:34 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 03:58:42PM +0530, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/28/2025 12:03 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:23:56AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed with status: %d\n", msg.resp.status);
>>>>>> + ret = msg.resp.status;
>>>>>
>>>>> return msg.resp.status (is it really errno?)
>>>>>
>>>> ok, yes error.
>>>
>>> The question was if it is an errno, not if it is an error.
>> status != 0 is an error always.
>
> Is it an _errno_ ?
Dmitry's asking whether the status conforms to the Linux's errno.h
ABI. If not, add something like:
ret = msg.resp.status ? -EINVAL : 0
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists