[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bd783642-5806-405e-b52c-1ff0aa619e78@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 11:42:37 +0530
From: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
CC: <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>, <robh@...nel.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>, <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
<manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 2/2] mailbox: tmelite-qmp: Introduce TMEL QMP mailbox
driver
On 3/4/2025 3:16 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 at 10:33, Sricharan Ramabadhran
> <quic_srichara@...cinc.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 3/3/2025 6:34 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 03:58:42PM +0530, Sricharan Ramabadhran wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/28/2025 12:03 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 10:23:56AM +0530, Sricharan R wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed with status: %d\n", msg.resp.status);
>>>>>> + ret = msg.resp.status;
>>>>>
>>>>> return msg.resp.status (is it really errno?)
>>>>>
>>>> ok, yes error.
>>>
>>> The question was if it is an errno, not if it is an error.
>> status != 0 is an error always.
>
> Is it an _errno_ ?
Ho ok, good catch, checked the firmware spec, does not map to a standard
Linux error code. Will check and return a standard __errno__.
Regards,
Sricharan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists