linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] sched/rt: Fix race in push_rt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <38470D92-7862-4921-A2D6-E8B37E15FBCD@nutanix.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 18:57:29 +0000
From: Harshit Agarwal <harshit@...anix.com>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
CC: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Vincent Guittot
	<vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
        Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        Valentin
 Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jon Kohler <jon@...anix.com>,
        Gauri
 Patwardhan <gauri.patwardhan@...anix.com>,
        Rahul Chunduru
	<rahul.chunduru@...anix.com>,
        Will Ton <william.ton@...anix.com>,
        "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sched/rt: Fix race in push_rt_task

Sorry for the repeat messages, my email client’s acting up. :)

> On Mar 4, 2025, at 8:18 AM, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
> !-------------------------------------------------------------------|
>  CAUTION: External Email
> 
> |-------------------------------------------------------------------!
> 
> On 04/03/25 10:30, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>> On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 09:15:55 +0000
>> Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> As usual, we have essentially the same in deadline.c, do you think we
>>> should/could implement the same fix proactively in there as well? Steve?
>>> 
>> 
>> Probably. It would be better if we could find a way to consolidate the
>> functionality so that when we fix a bug in one, the other gets fixed too.
> 
> That would be nice indeed.
> 
> Thanks,
> Juri
>