[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8hiqzCMoyxHj9rL@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 16:41:47 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] bits: introduce fixed-type genmasks
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 11:38:19PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol wrote:
> On 05/03/2025 at 23:30, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 10:00:15PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay wrote:
...
> > Perhaps T or TYPE will suffice. Or perhaps we want
> > __GENMASK_Uxx() here?
>
> If no objection, I have a preference for GENMASK_TYPE().
No objection from me :-)
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists