linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Enable IPQ5018 PCI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID:
 <DS7PR19MB8883484545BE6AE9E12B5AF69DCB2@DS7PR19MB8883.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 20:59:44 +0400
From: George Moussalem <george.moussalem@...look.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, andersson@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
 conor+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, kishon@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org,
 krzk+dt@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, lpieralisi@...nel.org,
 manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
 quic_nsekar@...cinc.com, robh@...nel.org, robimarko@...il.com,
 vkoul@...nel.org
Cc: quic_srichara@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Enable IPQ5018 PCI support

> On 05/03/2025 14:41, George Moussalem wrote:
>> From: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
> Not correct From. Cover letter should be written by you.
Noted. I thought I'd keep the original author included and added my v3 changes which you rightfully pointed out should have been v4 instead.
Will remove in next version.
>
>> This patch series adds the relevant phy and controller
>> DT configurations for enabling PCI gen2 support
>> on IPQ5018. IPQ5018 has two phys and two controllers, 
>> one dual-lane and one single-lane.
>>
>> Last patch series (v2) submitted dates back to August 27, 2024.
>> As I've worked to add IPQ5018 platform support in OpenWrt, I'm
>> continuing the efforts to add Linux kernel support.
>>
>> v3:
>>   *) Depends on: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/cover/20250220094251.230936-1-quic_varada@quicinc.com/
>
> Wasn't this applied, so why is it still a dependency?
I explicitly added it as ipq5332 has not made it to the master branch yet. Should I remove?
>
>
>
>>   *) Added 8 MSI SPI and 1 global interrupts (Thanks Mani for confirming)
> Who did it? This v3 or other v3? Which v3 is this one here?
As I mentioned, I overlooked the v3 submission and based this series as the next version of v2. Thanks for pointing it out.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Cheers,
George