linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Enable IPQ5018 PCI support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b118bc5a-9f5c-476d-8af6-31e793ec5479@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 08:18:19 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: George Moussalem <george.moussalem@...look.com>,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
 andersson@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org, kishon@...nel.org,
 konradybcio@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com,
 lpieralisi@...nel.org, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
 p.zabel@...gutronix.de, quic_nsekar@...cinc.com, robh@...nel.org,
 robimarko@...il.com, vkoul@...nel.org
Cc: quic_srichara@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] Enable IPQ5018 PCI support

On 05/03/2025 17:59, George Moussalem wrote:
>> On 05/03/2025 14:41, George Moussalem wrote:
>>> From: Sricharan Ramabadhran <quic_srichara@...cinc.com>
>> Not correct From. Cover letter should be written by you.
> Noted. I thought I'd keep the original author included and added my v3 changes which you rightfully pointed out should have been v4 instead.
> Will remove in next version.
>>
>>> This patch series adds the relevant phy and controller
>>> DT configurations for enabling PCI gen2 support
>>> on IPQ5018. IPQ5018 has two phys and two controllers, 
>>> one dual-lane and one single-lane.
>>>
>>> Last patch series (v2) submitted dates back to August 27, 2024.
>>> As I've worked to add IPQ5018 platform support in OpenWrt, I'm
>>> continuing the efforts to add Linux kernel support.
>>>
>>> v3:
>>>   *) Depends on: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/cover/20250220094251.230936-1-quic_varada@quicinc.com/
>>
>> Wasn't this applied, so why is it still a dependency?
> I explicitly added it as ipq5332 has not made it to the master branch yet. Should I remove?

If you treat something not yet released as dependency, then please stop
sending so many versions because nothing here can be applied for this cycle.

Why is this a dependency?

Best regards,
Krzysztof