linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH RESEND v1] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quickspi: Correct device state after S4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <q70795qp-nq3p-r181-15qn-on41n588s770@xreary.bet>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 09:44:19 +0100 (CET)
From: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>
To: "Xu, Even" <even.xu@...el.com>
cc: "bentiss@...nel.org" <bentiss@...nel.org>, 
    "srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com" <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>, 
    "mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca" <mpearson-lenovo@...ebb.ca>, 
    "linux-input@...r.kernel.org" <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>, 
    "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND v1] HID: Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quickspi: Correct
 device state after S4

On Wed, 5 Mar 2025, Xu, Even wrote:

> I didn't realize v1 patch already got applied, just sent out v2 patch 
> this morning. If so, could you just pick " [PATCH v2 1/2] HID: 
> Intel-thc-hid: Intel-quickspi: Correct device state names gramatically" 
> from v2 patch set for the naming fix? Those two patches have no 
> confliction/dependence.

2/2 now in hid.git#for-6.15/intel-thc. Thanks,

-- 
Jiri Kosina
SUSE Labs