[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8gRh5wtzbpiV8JM@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 09:55:35 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
Cc: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/4] scanf: implicate test line in failure messages
On Fri 2025-02-14 11:19:58, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> This improves the failure output by pointing to the failing line at the
> top level of the test.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tamir Duberstein <tamird@...il.com>
I like it. It helps a lot to locate the failing test.
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Tested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists