[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20250306171829.365809-1-trintaeoitogc@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 14:18:29 -0300
From: Guilherme Giacomo Simoes <trintaeoitogc@...il.com>
To: miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com
Cc: a.hindborg@...nel.org,
alex.gaynor@...il.com,
aliceryhl@...gle.com,
apw@...onical.com,
arnd@...db.de,
aswinunni01@...il.com,
axboe@...nel.dk,
benno.lossin@...ton.me,
bhelgaas@...gle.com,
bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com,
boqun.feng@...il.com,
dakr@...nel.org,
dwaipayanray1@...il.com,
ethan.twardy@...il.com,
fujita.tomonori@...il.com,
gary@...yguo.net,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
joe@...ches.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lukas.bulwahn@...il.com,
ojeda@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org,
tmgross@...ch.edu,
trintaeoitogc@...il.com,
walmeida@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 2/2] checkpatch: check format of Vec<String> in modules
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com> wrote:
> So if I understand correctly, `rustfmt` will simply not do anything,
> i.e. it will always keep the array as it was -- that sounds good
> enough to me! Most people will write it correctly, and for those that
> don't, `checkpatch.pl` will likely catch the mistake -- that is all we
> need.
Ok, but, how is mentioned by Andreas Hindborg, this scenary is passing:
authors: [
"John Doe",
"Foo Bar"
],
Is good make a check for this too and senda a v7
Thanks,
Guilherme
Powered by blists - more mailing lists