[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <174130146134.987559.8662566490718210141.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2025 14:51:01 -0800
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Michael Walle <mwalle@...nel.org>, Bamvor Jian Zhang <bamv2005@...il.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@...com>,
Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@...aro.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>,
linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: (subset) [PATCH v2 01/15] leds: aw200xx: don't use return with
gpiod_set_value() variants
On Thu, 20 Feb 2025 10:56:58 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> While gpiod_set_value() currently returns void, it will soon be converted
> to return an integer instead. Don't do `return gpiod_set...`.
>
>
Applied, thanks!
[01/15] leds: aw200xx: don't use return with gpiod_set_value() variants
commit: 5d5e2a6f15a6c5e0c431c1388fd90e14b448da1e
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists