[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <03b14353-5d47-48de-99fd-9cc48bad5651@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 08:29:06 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Wilson Ding <dingwei@...vell.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"gregory.clement@...tlin.com" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
"sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com" <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Sanghoon Lee <salee@...vell.com>, Geethasowjanya Akula <gakula@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] arm64: dts: marvell: cp11x: Add reset controller
node
On 04/03/2025 20:08, Wilson Ding wrote:
>
> I did consider shrinking the syscon's register address range to
> make the reset-controller node to be independent from the
> syscon node. However, I found the syscon node is also referred
> by some devices for miscellaneous configurations . The reset
> configuration register happens to be located in between these
> registers and clock/GPIO registers.
>
>> drop offset in your patch or unify everything into 'reg'.
>>
>
> This is exactly what I proposed in v3 patch. Do I misunderstand
> you?
>
> CP11X_LABEL(swrst): reset-controller@268 {
> compatible = "marvell,armada8k-reset";
> reg = <0x268 0x4>;
> #reset-cells = <1>;
> };
I don't see the other device being fixed here. How did you unify them?
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists