[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8l1ozUOMTDNQupC@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 12:14:59 +0200
From: Raag Jadav <raag.jadav@...el.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, lgirdwood@...il.com,
bleung@...omium.org, groeck@...omium.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Convert regulator drivers to use
devm_kmemdup_array()
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 11:19:31AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 04:15:55AM +0200, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 09:22:47PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:50:55 +0530, Raag Jadav wrote:
> > > > This series converts regulator drivers to use the newly introduced[1]
> > > > devm_kmemdup_array() helper. This depends on changes available on
> > > > immutable tag[2].
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250212062513.2254767-1-raag.jadav@intel.com
> > > > [2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/Z7xGpz3Q4Zj6YHx7@black.fi.intel.com
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > >
> > > Applied to
> > >
> > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> > Unless there's a nuance intended in the merge series title that I'm unable
> > to understand, it probably seems incomplete.
>
> I believe it's an issue somewhere in the scripts. The long Subject line is
> split in the mailbox and that's probably is not supported by the machinery.
>
> You are not the only one who reports this issue.
While I'm not well educated on the machinery, I'm also seeing devm_kmemdup_array()
introduction commit reordered in -next and thinking perhaps it can cause issues
with bisect, especially after final merge into Linus' tree?
Raag
Powered by blists - more mailing lists