[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8mfAQGUvm3z86kE@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 15:11:29 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr
Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov@...il.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...el.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Tvrtko Ursulin <tursulin@...ulin.net>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...ux.intel.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] test_bits: add tests for BIT_U*()
On Thu, Mar 06, 2025 at 08:29:58PM +0900, Vincent Mailhol via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Vincent Mailhol <mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr>
>
> Add some additional tests in lib/test_bits.c to cover the expected
> results of the fixed type BIT_U*() macros.
Still would be good to have a small assembly test case for GENMASK*() as they
went split and it will be a good regression test in case somebody decides to
unify both without much thinking..
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists