[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb2820d8-84e8-49ca-b497-1ea815679a3d@notapiano>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 10:22:36 -0300
From: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@...labora.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
Sen Chu <sen.chu@...iatek.com>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>,
Macpaul Lin <macpaul.lin@...iatek.com>, Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, kernel@...labora.com,
linux-sound@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/19] dt-bindings: mfd: mediatek: mt6397: Add accdet
subnode
On Fri, Mar 07, 2025 at 08:11:26AM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/03/2025 13:19, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote:
> >>> It is interfaced to host controller using SPI interface by a proprietary hardware
> >>> called PMIC wrapper or pwrap. MT6397/MT6323 PMIC is a child device of pwrap.
> >>> @@ -224,6 +225,30 @@ properties:
> >>> description:
> >>> Pin controller
> >>>
> >>> + accdet:
> >>> + type: object
> >>> + additionalProperties: false
> >>> + description:
> >>> + The Accessory Detection module found on the PMIC allows detecting audio
> >>> + jack insertion and removal, as well as identifying the type of events
> >>> + connected to the jack.
> >>> +
> >>> + properties:
> >>> + compatible:
> >>> + const: mediatek,mt6359-accdet
> >>
> >> You just removed the other file, no folding happened here. Drop the
> >> accdet node and fold this into parent.
> >
> > Sorry, I'm still not sure what you mean by folding here then. Right now the
> > accdet is a subnode of the PMIC. If you want me to remove the accdet node, where
>
> Yes
>
> > would its compatible and property go?
>
> compatible: nowhere, because it is close to redundancy.
>
> property: to the parent pmic node.
>
> pmic {
> compatible = "mediatek,mt6359";
> interrupt-controller;
> #interrupt-cells = <2>;
>
> mediatek,hp-eint-high;
> };
I'm not sure that's right. The ACCDET submodule does have some resources, IRQs,
that it registers in its mfd cell, see patch 2 of this series [1]. It also has
its own driver (sound/soc/codecs/mt6359-accdet.c) that probes based on this
compatible and handles those interrupts. Why would it not get its own node like
the other MFD cells?
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250305-mt6359-accdet-dts-v4-2-e5ffa5ee9991@collabora.com
Thanks,
Nícolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists