lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4566d2d1-1f59-49e3-ad75-45c27ac4dfda@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 15:43:51 +0000
From: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
 Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
 Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@...ux.dev>,
 Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>, Zenghui Yu
 <yuzenghui@...wei.com>, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@....com>,
 Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
 Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@....com>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@...gle.com>,
 linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
 Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@...amperecomputing.com>,
 Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@...dia.com>, Alper Gun
 <alpergun@...gle.com>, "Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 12/45] arm64: RME: Allocate/free RECs to match vCPUs

Hi Gavin,

On 03/03/2025 07:08, Gavin Shan wrote:
> On 2/14/25 2:13 AM, Steven Price wrote:
>> The RMM maintains a data structure known as the Realm Execution Context
>> (or REC). It is similar to struct kvm_vcpu and tracks the state of the
>> virtual CPUs. KVM must delegate memory and request the structures are
>> created when vCPUs are created, and suitably tear down on destruction.
>>
>> RECs must also be supplied with addition pages - auxiliary (or AUX)
>> granules - for storing the larger registers state (e.g. for SVE). The
>> number of AUX granules for a REC depends on the parameters with which
>> the Realm was created - the RMM makes this information available via the
>> RMI_REC_AUX_COUNT call performed after creating the Realm Descriptor
>> (RD).
>>
>> Note that only some of register state for the REC can be set by KVM, the
>> rest is defined by the RMM (zeroed). The register state then cannot be
>> changed by KVM after the REC is created (except when the guest
>> explicitly requests this e.g. by performing a PSCI call). The RMM also
>> requires that the VMM creates RECs in ascending order of the MPIDR.
>>
>> See Realm Management Monitor specification (DEN0137) for more
>> information:
>> https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0137/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@....com>
>> ---
>> Changes since v6:
>>   * Avoid reporting the KVM_ARM_VCPU_REC feature if the guest isn't a
>>     realm guest.
>>   * Support host page size being larger than RMM's granule size when
>>     allocating/freeing aux granules.
>> Changes since v5:
>>   * Separate the concept of vcpu_is_rec() and
>>     kvm_arm_vcpu_rec_finalized() by using the KVM_ARM_VCPU_REC feature as
>>     the indication that the VCPU is a REC.
>> Changes since v2:
>>   * Free rec->run earlier in kvm_destroy_realm() and adapt to previous
>> patches.
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h |   7 ++
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h    |   3 +
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h     |  18 +++
>>   arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                 |  13 +-
>>   arch/arm64/kvm/reset.c               |  11 ++
>>   arch/arm64/kvm/rme.c                 | 179 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   6 files changed, 229 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
> 
> With the following one comment addressed:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
> 
> [...]
> 
>>     /*
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h b/arch/arm64/include/
>> asm/kvm_rme.h
>> index 698bb48a8ae1..5db377943db4 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rme.h
>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>>   #ifndef __ASM_KVM_RME_H
>>   #define __ASM_KVM_RME_H
>>   +#include <asm/rmi_smc.h>
>>   #include <uapi/linux/kvm.h>
>>     /**
>> @@ -65,6 +66,21 @@ struct realm {
>>       unsigned int ia_bits;
>>   };
>>   +/**
>> + * struct realm_rec - Additional per VCPU data for a Realm
>> + *
>> + * @mpidr: MPIDR (Multiprocessor Affinity Register) value to identify
>> this VCPU
>> + * @rec_page: Kernel VA of the RMM's private page for this REC
>> + * @aux_pages: Additional pages private to the RMM for this REC
>> + * @run: Kernel VA of the RmiRecRun structure shared with the RMM
>> + */
>> +struct realm_rec {
>> +    unsigned long mpidr;
>> +    void *rec_page;
>> +    struct page *aux_pages[REC_PARAMS_AUX_GRANULES];
>> +    struct rec_run *run;
>> +};
>> +
> 
> REC_PARAMS_AUX_GRANULES represents the maximal number of the auxiliary
> granules.
> Since the base page size is always larger than or equal to granule size
> (4KB).
> The capacity of array @aux_pages[] needs to be REC_PARAMS_AUX_GRANULES.
> Ideally,
> the array's size can be computed dynamically and it's allocated in
> kvm_create_rec().

This is indeed another example of where pages and granules have got
mixed. The RMM specification provides a maximum number of granules (and
there's a similar array in struct rec_params). Here the use of
REC_PARAMS_AUX_GRANULES is just to keep the structure more simple (no
dynamic allocation) with the cost of ~128bytes. Obviously if
PAGE_SIZE>4k then this array could be smaller.

> Alternatively, to keep the code simple, a comment is needed here to
> explain why
> the array's size has been set to REC_PARAMS_AUX_GRANULES.

Definitely a valid point - this could do with a comment explaining the
situation.

> An relevant question: Do we plan to support differentiated sizes between
> page
> and granule? I had the assumption this feature will be supported in the
> future
> after the base model (equal page and granule size) gets merged first.

Yes I do plan to support it. This series actually has the basic support
in it already, with an experimental patch at the end enabling that
support. It "works" but I haven't tested it well and I think some of the
error handling isn't quite right yet.

But there's also a bunch more work to be done (like here) to avoid
over-allocating memory when PAGE_SIZE>4k. E.g. RTTs need an
sub-allocator so that we don't waste an entire (larger) page on each RTT.

Steve


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ