[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250307090332.5b556ebb@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 09:03:32 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Cc: Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh
<jv@...sburgh.net>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan
<shuah@...nel.org>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>, Jianbo Liu
<jianbol@...dia.com>, Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>, Steffen Klassert
<steffen.klassert@...unet.com>, Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>, Petr
Machata <petrm@...dia.com>, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 net 1/3] bonding: fix calling sleeping function in
spin lock and some race conditions
On Fri, 7 Mar 2025 09:42:49 +0200 Nikolay Aleksandrov wrote:
> TBH, keeping buggy code with a comment doesn't sound good to me. I'd rather remove this
> support than tell people "good luck, it might crash". It's better to be safe until a
> correct design is in place which takes care of these issues.
That's my feeling too, FWIW. I think we knew about this issue
for a while now, the longer we wait the more users we may disrupt
with the revert.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists