linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Z8q0Alpk8AXbGxgW@jlelli-thinkpadt14gen4.remote.csb>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 08:53:22 +0000
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
To: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
	Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qyousef@...alina.io>,
	Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
	Swapnil Sapkal <swapnil.sapkal@....com>,
	Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, luca.abeni@...tannapisa.it,
	tommaso.cucinotta@...tannapisa.it,
	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] sched/topology: Wrappers for sched_domains_mutex

Hi,

Thanks for the overall review!

On 07/03/25 12:04, Shrikanth Hegde wrote:
> Hi Juri.
> 
> On 3/6/25 19:40, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > Create wrappers for sched_domains_mutex so that it can transparently be
> > used on both CONFIG_SMP and !CONFIG_SMP, as some function will need to
> > do.

...

> Maybe sched_domains_mutex can be static since its only used in topology.c ?

We have a lockdep_assert in cpuset.c, don't we? We can create another
wrapper for that, but I am not sure it is going to be cleaner.

Thanks,
Juri