linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH hyperv-next v5 06/11] arm64, x86: hyperv: Report the VTL the system boots in

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ce6f5bb0-545f-4d9f-a792-29a2f1520ba8@linux.microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:20:02 -0700
From: Roman Kisel <romank@...ux.microsoft.com>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>
Cc: arnd@...db.de, bhelgaas@...gle.com, bp@...en8.de,
 catalin.marinas@....com, conor+dt@...nel.org, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
 decui@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, hpa@...or.com,
 joey.gouly@....com, krzk+dt@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, kys@...rosoft.com,
 lenb@...nel.org, lpieralisi@...nel.org, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
 mark.rutland@....com, maz@...nel.org, mingo@...hat.com,
 oliver.upton@...ux.dev, rafael@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
 ssengar@...ux.microsoft.com, sudeep.holla@....com, suzuki.poulose@....com,
 tglx@...utronix.de, will@...nel.org, yuzenghui@...wei.com,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
 apais@...rosoft.com, benhill@...rosoft.com, bperkins@...rosoft.com,
 sunilmut@...rosoft.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH hyperv-next v5 06/11] arm64, x86: hyperv: Report the VTL
 the system boots in



On 3/10/2025 9:53 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 09:42:15AM -0700, Roman Kisel wrote:

[...]

>>
>>> Please be consistent across different architectures.
>>>
>>
>> In the earlier versions of the patch series, I had that piece
>> from the above mirrored in the arm64, and there was advice on
>> removing the function as it contained just one statement.
>> I'll revisit the approach, thanks for your help!
> 
> As long as the output is consistent across different architectures, I'm
> good.

I should add a comment most likely to save people some time grepping
the code as the line does look like should always print that. IOW
not printing for VTL0 is obscured by the preprocessor/#define cruft.

> 
> Wei.
> 
>>
>>>>    	x86_platform.realmode_reserve = x86_init_noop;
>>>>    	x86_platform.realmode_init = x86_init_noop;
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.43.0
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Thank you,
>> Roman
>>

-- 
Thank you,
Roman