lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250311093752.703b3069@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 09:37:52 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, Frederic Weisbecker
 <frederic@...nel.org>, Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@...nel.org>,
 Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@...il.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List
 <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
 <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the rcu tree

Hi Boqun,

On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 15:00:09 -0700 Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for spotting this. These two are likely for the next next merge
> windows (i.e. for 6.16), and presumably they will be handled by Joel
> (Cced), so I deliberately avoid putting my SoB there.

The next merge window (starting in a couple of weeks) will be for
v6.15, so if the commits are intended for v6.16, then they should not
be in linux-next (yet).  If they are intended for v6.15, then they need
to have SoBs.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ