lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98ca3727d65a418e403b03f6b17341dbcb192764.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 18:38:01 -0400
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, 
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: pm80xx: Add __nonstring annotations for
 unterminated strings

On Mon, 2025-03-10 at 15:25 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> When a character array without a terminating NUL character has a
> static
> initializer, GCC 15's -Wunterminated-string-initialization will only
> warn if the array lacks the "nonstring" attribute[1]. Mark the arrays
> with __nonstring to and correctly identify the char array as "not a C
> string" and thereby eliminate the warning.
> 
> Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117178 [1]
> Cc: Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@...ud.ionos.com>
> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
> Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
> Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_ctl.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_ctl.c
> b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_ctl.c
> index 85ff95c6543a..7618f9cc9986 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_ctl.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/pm8001/pm8001_ctl.c
> @@ -644,7 +644,7 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(gsm_log, S_IRUGO,
> pm8001_ctl_gsm_log_show, NULL);
>  #define FLASH_CMD_SET_NVMD    0x02
>  
>  struct flash_command {
> -     u8      command[8];
> +     u8      command[8] __nonstring;

This looks a bit suboptimal ... is there anywhere in the kernel u8[] is
actually used for real strings?  In which case it would seem the better
place to put the annotation is in the typedef for u8 arrays.

Regards,

James


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ