[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d8be26ad-763b-4ab0-9f57-cfafad792194@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 16:38:36 +0530
From: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, lucas.demarchi@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
acme@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, jolsa@...nel.org, irogers@...gle.com,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] perf: Rename perf_event_exit_task(.child)
Hi Peter,
On 08-Mar-25 1:03 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> The task passed to perf_event_exit_task() is not a child, it is
> current. Fix this confusing naming, since much of the rest of the code
> also relies on it being current.
>
> Specifically, both exec() and exit() callers use it with current as
> the argument.
...
> -static void perf_event_exit_task_context(struct task_struct *child, bool exit)
> +static void perf_event_exit_task_context(struct task_struct *task, bool exit)
> {
> - struct perf_event_context *child_ctx, *clone_ctx = NULL;
> + struct perf_event_context *ctx, *clone_ctx = NULL;
> struct perf_event *child_event, *next;
>
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(child != current);
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(task != current);
exec() codepath (i.e. copy_process()) passes child pointer, not 'current'.
Thanks,
Ravi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists