[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250310140246.GKZ87xBg3gUkOwPOZX@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 15:02:46 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@...ux.ibm.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, x86@...nel.org,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] x86/sev: add SVSM vTPM probe/send_command
functions
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 08:56:53AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> It isn't needed. It's similar to "device" information/capabilities.
> Maybe pr_debug() then? But I'm also fine with not printing anything.
Yap, nothing it is then.
If the need arises, then we can debate :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists