[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250310140453.GLZ87xheyuki61V5Mo@fat_crate.local>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 2025 15:04:53 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Claudio Carvalho <cclaudio@...ux.ibm.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>, x86@...nel.org,
Dov Murik <dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com>, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
Dionna Glaze <dionnaglaze@...gle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/6] x86/sev: add SVSM vTPM probe/send_command
functions
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 02:59:44PM +0100, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 02:51:33PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 08:27:37AM -0500, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> > > I don't think anything needs to be checked or printed.
> >
> > Yes.
>
> Ack, I removed the check and the print.
>
> @Boris I also removed `ret` to continue the slimming, so the end
> result should be this:
>
> bool snp_svsm_vtpm_probe(void)
> {
> struct svsm_call call = {};
>
> /* The vTPM device is available only if a SVSM is present */
> if (!snp_vmpl)
> return false;
>
> call.caa = svsm_get_caa();
> call.rax = SVSM_VTPM_CALL(SVSM_VTPM_QUERY);
>
> if (svsm_perform_call_protocol(&call))
> return false;
>
> /* Check platform commands contains TPM_SEND_COMMAND - platform command 8 */
> return (call.rcx_out & BIT_ULL(8)) == BIT_ULL(8);
> }
>
> Quite nice, thanks for the review!
Thanks, looks clean to me. :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists