[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9BKW_06nLAOzYfY@pathway.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:36:11 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
Ray Jui <rjui@...adcom.com>, Scott Branden <sbranden@...adcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list <bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...omium.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alex Shi <alexs@...nel.org>, Yanteng Si <si.yanteng@...ux.dev>,
Binbin Zhou <zhoubinbin@...ngson.cn>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Liu Ying <victor.liu@....com>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] vsprintf: remove redundant and unused %pCn format
specifier
On Tue 2025-03-11 10:21:23, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> %pC and %pCn print the same string, and commit 900cca294425 ("lib/vsprintf:
> add %pC{,n,r} format specifiers for clocks") introducing them does not
> clarify any intended difference. It can be assumed %pC is a default for
> %pCn as some other specifiers do, but not all are consistent with this
> policy. Moreover there is now no other suffix other than 'n', which makes a
> default not really useful.
>
> All users in the kernel were using %pC except for one which has been
> converted. So now remove %pCn and all the unnecessary extra code and
> documentation.
>
> Acked-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@...tlin.com>
Makes sense. Looks and works well, so:
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Tested-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Daniel, if I get it correctly, you have already taken the 1st patch.
Would you mind to take also this patch using the same tree, please?
Otherwise, we would need to coordinate pull requests in the upcoming
merge window ;-)
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists