[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250311143724.GE3493@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 15:37:25 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Fangrui Song <i@...kray.me>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with
CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
On 03/11, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 12:21:12PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > Yap, that fixes the build:
>
> Lemme run randbuilds with that one, see what else breaks with it.
sorry for the off-topic noise, but what about the
[PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241206123207.GA2091@redhat.com/
fix for the older binutils? It was acked by Ard.
Should I resend it?
Oleg.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists