[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250311174626.GHZ9B28rDrfWKJthsN@fat_crate.local>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 18:46:26 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Uros Bizjak <ubizjak@...il.com>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Fangrui Song <i@...kray.me>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with
CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 03:37:25PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> sorry for the off-topic noise, but what about the
>
> [PATCH] x86/stackprotector: fix build failure with CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR=n
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241206123207.GA2091@redhat.com/
>
> fix for the older binutils? It was acked by Ard.
>
> Should I resend it?
Can you pls explain how you trigger this?
I just did a
# CONFIG_STACKPROTECTOR is not set
build here and it was fine.
So there's something else I'm missing.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists