[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b21b5f03-e328-4708-a854-1b3fa9c3dfa3@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 18:11:21 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
Cc: Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>, Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
Satya Priya Kakitapalli <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] clk: qcom: Add support to attach multiple power
domains in cc probe
On 11/03/2025 17:55, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>
> I kindly ask to elaborate here.
>
> This series does not touch CAMCC at all, and if the series touches CAMCC,
> then it changes DT ABI, which is objected. Or is it for some reason
> objected only for SM8550 and not for the other platforms? More information
> is needed.
No but it _should_ Vlad, that's the ask.
Both of these clock controllers will require this same change to be
implemented, that's what I'm asking Jagadeesh to do.
Certainly that's the case for x1e and asking Jagadeesh to also check
that for sm8650.
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists