linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] clk: qcom: Add support to attach multiple power domains in cc probe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cd092022-cf6d-421a-a29d-69f7f4f068b6@quicinc.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:41:28 +0530
From: Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>
To: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>,
        Vladimir Zapolskiy
	<vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>
CC: Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
        Imran Shaik
	<quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
        Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>,
        "Satya Priya
 Kakitapalli" <quic_skakitap@...cinc.com>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Dmitry Baryshkov
	<dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] clk: qcom: Add support to attach multiple power
 domains in cc probe



On 3/11/2025 11:41 PM, Bryan O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 11/03/2025 17:55, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>
>> I kindly ask to elaborate here.
>>
>> This series does not touch CAMCC at all, and if the series touches CAMCC,
>> then it changes DT ABI, which is objected. Or is it for some reason
>> objected only for SM8550 and not for the other platforms? More information
>> is needed.
> 
> No but it _should_ Vlad, that's the ask.
> 
> Both of these clock controllers will require this same change to be implemented, that's what I'm asking Jagadeesh to do.
> 
> Certainly that's the case for x1e and asking Jagadeesh to also check that for sm8650.
> 

Yes, similar changes are required for camcc on SM8450, SM8550, SM8650 and X1E80100. I will add them in the v3 series.
For X1E80100 camcc, I see changes are already raised in dt-bindings[1] and DT[2] to add multi PD support, so I will just
include the camcc driver change in v3 for X1E80100.

[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250304143152.1799966-1-vladimir.zapolskiy@linaro.org/
[2]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250119-b4-linux-next-24-11-18-dtsi-x1e80100-camss-v4-2-c2964504131c@linaro.org/

Thanks,
Jagadeesh

> ---
> bod