[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <885ceb3e-d6c6-4e7b-a3b6-585d2d110ccf@web.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 20:54:13 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Bence Csókás <csokas.bence@...lan.hu>,
dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...nel.org>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] dma-engine: sun4i: Use devm functions in probe()
> Clean up error handling by using devm functions
> and dev_err_probe(). …
How good does such a change combination fit to the patch requirement
according to separation of concerns?
https://web.git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.14-rc6#n81
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists