[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z8_0JuNTDpgani-d@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 09:28:22 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Aleksandrs Vinarskis <alex.vinarskis@...il.com>
Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>,
Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@...ainline.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>,
laurentiu.tudor1@...l.com, abel.vesa@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] drm/msm/dp: Introduce link training per-segment
for LTTPRs
Hi Aleksandrs,
Just a drive-by comment.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:05:52PM +0100, Aleksandrs Vinarskis wrote:
> @@ -1084,10 +1091,13 @@ static int msm_dp_ctrl_update_vx_px(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl)
> }
>
> static bool msm_dp_ctrl_train_pattern_set(struct msm_dp_ctrl_private *ctrl,
> - u8 pattern)
> + u8 pattern, enum drm_dp_phy dp_phy)
> {
> u8 buf;
> int ret = 0;
> + int reg = dp_phy == DP_PHY_DPRX ?
> + DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_SET :
> + DP_TRAINING_PATTERN_SET_PHY_REPEATER(dp_phy);
This is hardly readable; avoid using the ternary operator and split
declaration from non-trivial initialisation.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists