[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM8PR11MB5751B33EF33ED26FD8E63508C1D12@DM8PR11MB5751.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 10:34:33 +0000
From: "Ng, Boon Khai" <boon.khai.ng@...el.com>
To: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, linux-usb
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Boon Khai Ng <boon.khai.ng@...era.com>, Tien Sung Ang
<tien.sung.ang@...era.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] USB: serial: ftdi_sio: add support for Altera USB
Blaster 3
> But for your future contributions, remember to put a short changelog here
> under the cut-off (---) line when revising patches.
My apology will include that next time.
>
> These configurations were not mentioned in the commit message. Are they
> also used for embedded designs?
Looks like the table I provided in the commit message is mismatched with
the one that I intended to check in for upstream.
Let me correct this, the one that I published for upstream was the actual tested
code, whereby we want the UART to be exposed to the ftdi_sio driver.
Below is the updated table,
1) PID 0x6022, FT2232, 1 JTAG port(Port A) + Port B as UART
2) PID 0x6025, FT4232, 1 JTAG port(Port A) + Port C as UART
3) PID 0x6026, FT4232, 1 JTAG port(Port A) + Port C, D as UART
4) PID 0x6029, FT4232, 1 JTAG port(Port B) + Port C as UART
5) PID 0x602a, FT4232, 1 JTAG port(Port B) + Port C, D as UART
6) PID 0x602c, FT4232, 1 JTAG port(Port A) + Port B as UART
7) PID 0x602d, FT4232, 1 JTAG port(Port A) + Port B, C as UART
8) PID 0x602e, FT4232, 1 JTAG port(Port A) + Port B, C, D as UART
Since we need UART to be exposed to the ftdi_sio driver and the cable USB Blaster
does not support UART, will reword that on the commit message to remove the
cable USB Blaster and left only the on-board USB Blaster.
Will submit a v3 on this, with the reworded commit message plus the change log.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists