[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250311020806.404-1-yunjeong.mun@sk.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 11:07:27 +0900
From: Yunjeong Mun <yunjeong.mun@...com>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
Cc: kernel_team@...ynix.com,
Joshua Hahn <joshua.hahnjy@...il.com>,
harry.yoo@...cle.com,
ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
rakie.kim@...com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
rafael@...nel.org,
lenb@...nel.org,
dan.j.williams@...el.com,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com,
dave.jiang@...el.com,
horen.chuang@...ux.dev,
hannes@...xchg.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org,
kernel-team@...a.com,
yunjeong.mun@...com,
Honggyu Kim <honggyu.kim@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v6] mm/mempolicy: Don't create weight sysfs for memoryless nodes
Hi Gregory,
On Mon, 10 Mar 2025 10:22:11 -0400 Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 09:26:48PM +0900, Honggyu Kim wrote:
> > Yeah, the proximity domain detects the node correctly as follows in dmesg.
> >
> > [ 0.009915] ACPI: SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x00000000-0x7fffffff]
> > [ 0.009917] ACPI: SRAT: Node 0 PXM 0 [mem 0x100000000-0x207fffffff]
> > [ 0.009919] ACPI: SRAT: Node 1 PXM 1 [mem 0x60f80000000-0x64f7fffffff]
> > [ 0.009924] ACPI: SRAT: Node 2 PXM 6 [mem 0x2080000000-0x807fffffff] hotplug
> > [ 0.009925] ACPI: SRAT: Node 3 PXM 7 [mem 0x64f80000000-0x6cf7fffffff] hotplug
> >
> > It is printed even before CXL detection.
> >
>
> I wrote a some documentation on some example configurations last friday
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Z226PG9t-Ih7fJDL@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F/T/#m2780e47df7f0962a79182502afc99843bb046205
>
I've checked our CFMWS configurations using the information from this link and
wrote them below.
> This isn't exhaustive, but as I said with Rakie, I think your
> configuration is probably ok - if slightly confusing.
>
I wonder if the below data is sufficient for your review in Rakies's
email [1]. Please let me know.
> What I'm going to guess is happening is you have 1 CFMWS per device that
> do not have matching SRAT entries, and then the CFMWS covering these:
>
> > [ 0.009924] ACPI: SRAT: Node 2 PXM 6 [mem 0x2080000000-0x807fffffff] hotplug
> > [ 0.009925] ACPI: SRAT: Node 3 PXM 7 [mem 0x64f80000000-0x6cf7fffffff] hotplug
>
> have interleave set up
>
In my understanding, both SRAT and CFMWS have the above device and interleave setup.
Below are the SRAT entries (with some unnecessary lines removed) :
[A128h 41256 001h] Subtable Type : 01 [Memory Affinity]
[A12Ah 41258 004h] Proximity Domain : 00000006
[A130h 41264 008h] Base Address : 0000002080000000
[A138h 41272 008h] Address Length : 0000006000000000
Enabled : 1
Hot Pluggable : 1
...
[A150h 41296 001h] Subtable Type : 01 [Memory Affinity]
[A152h 41298 004h] Proximity Domain : 00000007
[A158h 41304 008h] Base Address : 0000064F80000000
[A160h 41312 008h] Address Length : 0000008000000000
Enabled : 1
Hot Pluggable : 1
and below are the CFMWS configurations (with some unnecessary lines removed):
[0A4h 0164 001h] Subtable Type : 01 [CXL Fixed Memory Window Structure]
[0ACh 0172 008h] Window base address : 0000002080000000 <- Memory region
[0B4h 0180 008h] Window size : 0000032780000000
[0BCh 0188 001h] Interleave Members : 01 <-- 2-way interleave
[0BDh 0189 001h] Interleave Arithmetic : 01
[0C8h 0200 004h] First Target : 00000043 <-- host bridge id
[0CCh 0204 004h] Next Target : 00000053 <-- host bridge id
...
[170h 0368 001h] Subtable Type : 01 [CXL Fixed Memory Window Structure]
[178h 0376 008h] Window base address : 0000064F80000000
[180h 0384 008h] Window size : 0000033000000000
[188h 0392 001h] Interleave Members : 01 <-- 2-way interleave
[189h 0393 001h] Interleave Arithmetic : 01
[194h 0404 004h] First Target : 00000143 <-- host bridge id
[198h 0408 004h] Next Target : 00000153 <-- host bridge id
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/Z87zpg3TLRReikgu@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F/
Best regards,
Yunjeong
Powered by blists - more mailing lists