lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8efdc560-d061-4f03-bed5-8571044119cc@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 22:10:17 +0530
From: Kathiravan Thirumoorthy <kathiravan.thirumoorthy@....qualcomm.com>
To: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>, andersson@...nel.org,
        konradybcio@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
        conor+dt@...nel.org, quic_srichara@...cinc.com,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: quic_varada@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] arm64: dts: qcom: ipq5424: fix and relocate uart1 gpio
 configurations

On 3/12/2025 2:44 PM, Manikanta Mylavarapu wrote:
> Update the bias configuration for UART1 TX and RX pins to ensure correct
> settings for RDP466.
>
> Additionally, move the UART1 GPIO configurations from the common .dtsi
> file to the RDP-specific .dts files to account for differing bias
> configurations across RDPs of IPQ5424.
>
> Fixes: 1a91d2a6021e ("arm64: dts: qcom: add IPQ5424 SoC and rdp466 board support")
> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@...cinc.com>
> ---
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424-rdp466.dts | 16 +++++++++++++++-
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424.dtsi       |  7 -------
>   2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424-rdp466.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424-rdp466.dts
> index b6e4bb3328b3..7b85aaa11ee8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424-rdp466.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424-rdp466.dts
> @@ -147,10 +147,24 @@ data-pins {
>   			bias-pull-up;
>   		};
>   	};
> +
> +	uart1_tx_state: uart1-tx-state {
> +		pins = "gpio44";
> +		function = "uart1";
> +		drive-strength = <8>;
> +		bias-pull-down;
> +	};
> +
> +	uart1_rx_state: uart1-rx-state {
> +		pins = "gpio43";
> +		function = "uart1";
> +		drive-strength = <8>;
> +		bias-pull-up;
> +	};
>   };
>   
>   &uart1 {
> -	pinctrl-0 = <&uart1_pins>;
> +	pinctrl-0 = <&uart1_tx_state>, <&uart1_rx_state>;


Change LGTM. But can we define both TX and RX pin definition under one 
node like below, to align with the SPI and SDCC gpio definition layout?

qup_uart1_default_state: qup-uart1-default-state {

         uart1_tx_state: uart1-tx-state {

          ...

         };

         uart1_rx_state: uart1-rx-state {

          ...

         };

};

and refer it like pinctrl-0 = <&qup_uart1_default_state>;


>   	pinctrl-names = "default";
>   	status = "okay";
>   };
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424.dtsi
> index 7a7ad700a382..e190c43c1b11 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/ipq5424.dtsi
> @@ -262,13 +262,6 @@ tlmm: pinctrl@...0000 {
>   			gpio-ranges = <&tlmm 0 0 50>;
>   			interrupt-controller;
>   			#interrupt-cells = <2>;
> -
> -			uart1_pins: uart1-state {
> -				pins = "gpio43", "gpio44";
> -				function = "uart1";
> -				drive-strength = <8>;
> -				bias-pull-up;
> -			};
>   		};
>   
>   		gcc: clock-controller@...0000 {
>
> base-commit: 0a2f889128969dab41861b6e40111aa03dc57014

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ