[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <17a7ca5a-31f5-47fc-ab67-348df20b31ec@amperemail.onmicrosoft.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 14:04:51 -0400
From: Adam Young <admiyo@...eremail.onmicrosoft.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Adam Young <admiyo@...amperecomputing.com>,
Huisong Li <lihuisong@...wei.com>, Robbie King <robbiek@...ghtlabs.com>
Cc: Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>, Andi Shyti
<andi.shyti@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/13] mailbox: pcc: Fixes and cleanup/refactoring
The XGene patch did not apply on top of Linus's current tree. The other
patches applied OK.
I only had to make one modification to my patch to remove the call to
‘pcc_mbox_ioremap’, as it is performed in the pcc_mbox_request_channel
call instead. With that change, my driver continues to work. I will
submit another version here shortly.
I like the direction that this change is pushing, making the mailbox
layer the owner for other drivers.
On 3/11/25 08:10, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 04:38:04PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> Adam, Robbie, Huisong,
>>
>> Please test this in your setup as you are the ones reporting/fixing the
>> issues or last modified the code that I am changing here.
>>
> Huisong,
>
> Thanks a lot for all the testing and review.
>
> Adam, Robbie,
>
> Can you please help me with the testing on your platforms ?
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists