[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0hgzVvA6vcRxUeByhVPgjyeUfY7v5Aj5GPi=_T_XWpPvQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 21:20:25 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] PM: s2idle: A couple of minor lock-simplifications
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 5:08 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> While working on s2idle a few things caught my attention when looking
> closer in the code in the s2idle_enter(), in regards to locks. These two
> patches tries to improve the situation a bit.
>
> Kind regards
> Ulf Hansson
>
> Ulf Hansson (2):
> PM: s2idle: Drop redundant locks when entering s2idle
> PM: s2idle: Extend comment in s2idle_enter()
>
> kernel/power/suspend.c | 10 ++++++----
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> --
Both patches applied as 6.15 material, but I rewrote the new comments.
Hopefully, this is not a problem.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists