[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPDyKFq=Ne9xt5UaQWdWVFfu6fc8ZFmaNYiJ2s6kRCowVxzagw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:10:12 +0100
From: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] PM: s2idle: A couple of minor lock-simplifications
On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 at 21:20, Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 5:08 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > While working on s2idle a few things caught my attention when looking
> > closer in the code in the s2idle_enter(), in regards to locks. These two
> > patches tries to improve the situation a bit.
> >
> > Kind regards
> > Ulf Hansson
> >
> > Ulf Hansson (2):
> > PM: s2idle: Drop redundant locks when entering s2idle
> > PM: s2idle: Extend comment in s2idle_enter()
> >
> > kernel/power/suspend.c | 10 ++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
>
> Both patches applied as 6.15 material, but I rewrote the new comments.
Thanks!
> Hopefully, this is not a problem.
Looks good, thanks!
Kind regards
Uffe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists