[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Z9L_MgjuhrploEUm@gourry-fedora-PF4VCD3F>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:52:18 -0400
From: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
To: Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@...com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
joshua.hahnjy@...il.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com, kernel_team@...ynix.com,
honggyu.kim@...com, yunjeong.mun@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] mm/mempolicy: Fix memory leaks in
mempolicy_sysfs_init()
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 03:31:38PM +0900, Rakie Kim wrote:
> > Is this correct? If kobject_init_and_add fails, from other examples we
> > need only free the mempolicy_kobj - because it failed to initialize and
> > therefore should not have any references. I think this causes an
> > underflow.
>
> Regarding the reordering of mempolicy_kobj allocation:
> 1) In kobject_init_and_add(), kobject_init() is always called, which
Quite right, mea culpa.
>
> 2) The release function for mempolicy_kobj is responsible for freeing
> associated memory:
>
> static void mempolicy_kobj_release(struct kobject *kobj)
> {
> ...
> kfree(ngrp->nattrs);
> kfree(ngrp);
> kfree(kobj);
> }
>
I see what you're trying to do now after looking at the free-ordering
at little closer.
Lets do the following:
1) allocate node_attrs and mempolicy_kobj up front and keep your
reordering, this lets us clean up allocations on failure before
kobject_init is called
2) after this remove all the other code and just let
mempolicy_kobj_release clean up node_attrs
3) Add a (%d) to the error message to differentiate failures
This is a little bit cleaner and is a bit less code. (Not built or
tested, just a recommendation).
I'd recommend submitting this patch by itself to mm-stable, since the
remainder of the patch line changes functionality and this fixes a bug
in LTS kernels.
~Gregory
---
diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
index 530e71fe9147..05a410db08b4 100644
--- a/mm/mempolicy.c
+++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
@@ -3541,38 +3541,34 @@ static int __init mempolicy_sysfs_init(void)
int err;
static struct kobject *mempolicy_kobj;
- mempolicy_kobj = kzalloc(sizeof(*mempolicy_kobj), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!mempolicy_kobj) {
+ node_attrs = kcalloc(nr_node_ids, sizeof(struct iw_node_attr *),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!node_attrs) {
err = -ENOMEM;
goto err_out;
}
- node_attrs = kcalloc(nr_node_ids, sizeof(struct iw_node_attr *),
- GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!node_attrs) {
+ mempolicy_kobj = kzalloc(sizeof(*mempolicy_kobj), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!mempolicy_kobj) {
err = -ENOMEM;
- goto mempol_out;
+ kfree(node_attrs);
+ goto err_out;
}
err = kobject_init_and_add(mempolicy_kobj, &mempolicy_ktype, mm_kobj,
"mempolicy");
if (err)
- goto node_out;
+ goto mempol_out;
err = add_weighted_interleave_group(mempolicy_kobj);
- if (err) {
- pr_err("mempolicy sysfs structure failed to initialize\n");
- kobject_put(mempolicy_kobj);
- return err;
- }
+ if (err)
+ goto mempol_out;
- return err;
-node_out:
- kfree(node_attrs);
+ return 0;
mempol_out:
- kfree(mempolicy_kobj);
+ kobject_put(mempolicy_kobj);
err_out:
- pr_err("failed to add mempolicy kobject to the system\n");
+ pr_err("mempolicy sysfs structure failed to initialize (%d)\n", err);
return err;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists