linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add support for suppressing warning backtraces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20250313150505.cf1568bf7197a52a8ab302e6@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 15:05:05 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>,
 Alessandro Carminati <acarmina@...hat.com>,
 linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Arnd
 Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Maíra Canal
 <mcanal@...lia.com>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>, Daniel Diaz
 <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>, David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>, Arthur Grillo
 <arthurgrillo@...eup.net>, Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
 Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>, Maarten Lankhorst
 <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>, Ville Syrjälä
 <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, Thomas
 Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>, Alessandro Carminati
 <alessandro.carminati@...il.com>, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
 dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
 linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
 linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add support for suppressing warning backtraces

On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:31:12 -0700 Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 06:24:25PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > 
> > > Yeah, as with my prior review, I'm a fan of this. It makes a bunch of my
> > > very noisy tests much easier to deal with.
> > 
> > And for the record, we're also affected by this in DRM and would very
> > much like to get it merged in one shape or another.
> > 
> 
> I was unable to get maintainers of major architectures interested enough
> to provide feedback, and did not see a path forward. Maybe Alessandro
> has more success than me.

I'll put them into mm.git, to advance things a bit.

If someone wants to merge via a different tree, please speak up.

Hopefully the various arch maintainers will review at least their parts
of the series.