linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add support for suppressing warning backtraces

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c8287bde-fa1c-4113-af22-4701d40d386e@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 11:31:12 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees@...nel.org>, Alessandro Carminati <acarmina@...hat.com>,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Maíra Canal <mcanal@...lia.com>,
	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
	Daniel Diaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
	David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>,
	Arthur Grillo <arthurgrillo@...eup.net>,
	Brendan Higgins <brendan.higgins@...ux.dev>,
	Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
	Alessandro Carminati <alessandro.carminati@...il.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>,
	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/14] Add support for suppressing warning backtraces

On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 06:24:25PM +0100, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > 
> > Yeah, as with my prior review, I'm a fan of this. It makes a bunch of my
> > very noisy tests much easier to deal with.
> 
> And for the record, we're also affected by this in DRM and would very
> much like to get it merged in one shape or another.
> 

I was unable to get maintainers of major architectures interested enough
to provide feedback, and did not see a path forward. Maybe Alessandro
has more success than me.

Guenter