[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5tt4wli2yodoet2l6r7ksq3o743nmi75hfksakqaxre3gmyr2a@zdotamju5ndp>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 18:17:27 -0500
From: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>
To: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>, Imran Shaik <quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/10] dt-bindings: clock: Add Qualcomm QCS615
Graphics clock controller
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 02:18:57PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
>
>
> On 3/13/2025 1:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:29:43PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> > +
> >> + '#reset-cells':
> >> + const: 1
> >> +
> >> + '#power-domain-cells':
> >> + const: 1
> >> +
> >> +required:
> >> + - compatible
> >> + - reg
> >> + - clocks
> >> + - '#clock-cells'
> >> + - '#reset-cells'
> >> + - '#power-domain-cells'
> >> +
> >
> > I don't get why this binding is different than others and you do not
> > reference qcom,gcc.yaml? Is it not applicable here? Other gpucc do
> > reference.
> >
>
> Yes, I will fix them and resend.
>
What is it that you will fix and resend? This patch or all other cases?
Please stop just throwing stuff at the list and until something sticks,
talk with the people who review your patches.
Regards,
Bjorn
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Krzysztof
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists