[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d1814cd9-5c73-4ac5-a4ed-4cc2aae410d0@quicinc.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 14:18:57 +0530
From: Taniya Das <quic_tdas@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
CC: Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette
<mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring
<robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon
<will@...nel.org>, Ajit Pandey <quic_ajipan@...cinc.com>,
Imran Shaik
<quic_imrashai@...cinc.com>,
Jagadeesh Kona <quic_jkona@...cinc.com>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/10] dt-bindings: clock: Add Qualcomm QCS615 Graphics
clock controller
On 3/13/2025 1:54 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 12:29:43PM +0530, Taniya Das wrote:
> +
>> + '#reset-cells':
>> + const: 1
>> +
>> + '#power-domain-cells':
>> + const: 1
>> +
>> +required:
>> + - compatible
>> + - reg
>> + - clocks
>> + - '#clock-cells'
>> + - '#reset-cells'
>> + - '#power-domain-cells'
>> +
>
> I don't get why this binding is different than others and you do not
> reference qcom,gcc.yaml? Is it not applicable here? Other gpucc do
> reference.
>
Yes, I will fix them and resend.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists