lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1c88f01b-4414-4f02-91ed-572a9261543a@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:01:54 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
 lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
 robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/4] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add MHI registers for
 IPQ9574

On 13/03/2025 09:05, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> Append the MHI register range to IPQ9574. This is an optional range used

Same question, you still did not answer - does hardware have this range?
Which hardware has it?

I pointed out that you affect at least two other variants. Your commit
msg must explain that. For example what if they do not have this range?
Then this change is just wrong.

Start documenting the hardware, not your drivers.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ