[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAH-L+nMDeX1J0GHNqfs+6YDRK93WwfW+4RYz9Sk9_Y455rQghw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 08:10:09 +0530
From: Kalesh Anakkur Purayil <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@...adcom.com>
To: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
Gal Pressman <gal@...dia.com>, Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>, Moshe Shemesh <moshe@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Yael Chemla <ychemla@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/4] net/mlx5e: Ensure each counter group uses
its PCAM bit
On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 12:56 AM Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com> wrote:
>
> From: Yael Chemla <ychemla@...dia.com>
>
> The code was incorrectly relying on PCAM bit of ppcnt_statistical_group
> for accessing per_lane_error_counters.
> If ppcnt_statistical_group PCAM bit was not set, we would not read
> per_lane_error_counters, even when its PCAM bit is set.
> Given the existing device capabilities, it seems to cause no harm, so
> this change primarily serves as cleanup.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yael Chemla <ychemla@...dia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Cosmin Ratiu <cratiu@...dia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
LGTM,
Reviewed-by: Kalesh AP <kalesh-anakkur.purayil@...adcom.com>
--
Regards,
Kalesh AP
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4226 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists