linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/mempolicy: Enable sysfs support for memory hotplug in weighted interleave

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250314063521.754-1-rakie.kim@sk.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 15:35:11 +0900
From: Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@...com>
To: Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org,
	joshua.hahnjy@...il.com,
	dan.j.williams@...el.com,
	ying.huang@...ux.alibaba.com,
	kernel_team@...ynix.com,
	honggyu.kim@...com,
	yunjeong.mun@...com,
	Rakie Kim <rakie.kim@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] mm/mempolicy: Enable sysfs support for memory hotplug in weighted interleave

On Thu, 13 Mar 2025 12:40:02 -0400 Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net> wrote:

Hi Gregory

> On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 03:34:10PM +0900, Rakie Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Mar 2025 12:14:48 -0400 Gregory Price <gourry@...rry.net> wrote:
> > 
> > Given that this adjustment is part of integrating the refactored
> > structure, I believe this patch does not need to be split into two.
> > However, I would appreciate any further input you may have on this.
> >
> 
> Another way of saying this is: can you please change the ordering of
> patch 2 and 3 and place the functional changes into "make mempolicy
> support memory hotplug" patch.
> 
> It's a little odd to "make mempolicy support memory hotplug" and then
> follow that up with a patch that says "now make it REALLY support it".
> 
> Patch 2 should read:
>    "Refactor weighted_interleave sysfs to allow node structure to be
>     dynamic"
> Patch 3 should read:
>    "Make weighted interleave sysfs structure support memory hotplug"
> 
> I think you'll find the patches end up looking much cleaner this way as
> well.
> 
> ~Gregory

Your suggestion seems appropriate. I will rearrange the order as you
suggested when creating version 3.

Rakie