linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] can: flexcan: only set CAN_STATE_ERROR

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20250314-invaluable-economic-caterpillar-80541a-mkl@pengutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 10:13:08 +0100
From: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@...gutronix.de>
To: haibo.chen@....com
Cc: mailhol.vincent@...adoo.fr, ciprianmarian.costea@....nxp.com, 
	han.xu@....com, u.kleine-koenig@...libre.com, linux-can@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] can: flexcan: only set CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE when
 resume has no issue

On 06.03.2025 14:59:20, haibo.chen@....com wrote:
> From: Haibo Chen <haibo.chen@....com>
> 
> Only set CAN state to CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE when resume process has
> no issue, otherwise keep in CAN_STATE_SLEEPING as suspend did.

When looking at the code, it makes no sense to set the can.state to
CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE, if the device isn't up.

The suspend function doesn't look correct, either. I'll send a v3.

Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                 | Marc Kleine-Budde          |
Embedded Linux                   | https://www.pengutronix.de |
Vertretung Nürnberg              | Phone: +49-5121-206917-129 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-9   |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)