[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYb5wPx18Y06CKzbqS0CS6KLkN+9YAun5XEXYfjj+c0uw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2025 11:55:55 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>, Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, Talel Shenhar <talel@...zon.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>, Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Herve Codina <herve.codina@...tlin.com>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>, Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/7] genirq/generic-chip: Convert core code to lock guards
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 3:31 PM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
> Replace the irq_gc_lock/unlock() pairs with guards. There is no point to
> implement a guard wrapper for them as they just wrap around raw_spin_lock*().
>
> Switch the other lock instances in the core code to guards as well.
>
> Conversion was done with Coccinelle plus manual fixups.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists