[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20250317164205.bp4vcqarggp3fnf4@skbuf>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 18:42:05 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
Cc: claudiu.manoil@....com, xiaoning.wang@....com, andrew+netdev@...n.ch,
davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
pabeni@...hat.com, christophe.leroy@...roup.eu,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
imx@...ts.linux.dev, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 net-next 06/14] net: enetc: add set/get_rss_table() to
enetc_si_ops
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 01:38:22PM +0800, Wei Fang wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> index d7d9a720069b..072e5b40a199 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/enetc/enetc_vf.c
> @@ -165,6 +165,8 @@ static void enetc_vf_netdev_setup(struct enetc_si *si, struct net_device *ndev,
> static const struct enetc_si_ops enetc_vsi_ops = {
> .setup_cbdr = enetc_setup_cbdr,
> .teardown_cbdr = enetc_teardown_cbdr,
> + .get_rss_table = enetc_get_rss_table,
> + .set_rss_table = enetc_set_rss_table,
> };
Are the CBDR-based enetc_get_rss_table() and enetc_set_rss_table()
the correct implementations for NETC v4 VSIs? (I guess not). Does
the driver/hardware fail in a civilized way, or does it crash?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists