[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db3bf1cb-3385-4676-8ba4-41fea0212bf2@kwiboo.se>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 20:50:34 +0100
From: Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley
<conor+dt@...nel.org>, David Wu <david.wu@...k-chips.com>,
Yao Zi <ziyao@...root.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Add GMAC support for RK3528
Hi Simon,
On 2025-03-17 20:43, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 09, 2025 at 11:26:10PM +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote:
>> The Rockchip RK3528 has two Ethernet controllers, one 100/10 MAC to be
>> used with the integrated PHY and a second 1000/100/10 MAC to be used
>> with an external Ethernet PHY.
>>
>> This series add initial support for the Ethernet controllers found in
>> RK3528 and initial support to power up/down the integrated PHY.
>>
>> This series depends on v2 of the "net: stmmac: dwmac-rk: Validate GRF
>> and peripheral GRF during probe" [1] cleanup series.
>>
>>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - Restrict the minItems: 4 change to rockchip,rk3528-gmac
>> - Add initial support to power up/down the integrated PHY in RK3528
>> - Split device tree changes into a separate series
>>
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250308213720.2517944-1-jonas@kwiboo.se/
>
> Hi Jonas,
>
> This patchset looks reasonable to me. However it will need
> to be reposted once it's dependencies ([1]) are present in net-next.
The dependent series ([1]) has already been merged into net-next [2].
Do I still need to repost this series?
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/r/174186063226.1446759.12026198009173732573.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org/
>
> And on the topic of process:
>
> * As this is a patch-set for net-next it would be best to
> target it accordingly:
>
> Subject: [PATCH net-next] ...
>
> * Please post patches for net/net-next which have dependencies as RFCs.
>
> For more information on Netdev processes please take a look at
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html
>
Thanks, I see, netdev seem to use a slight different process than what
I am familiar with compared to other Linux subsystems and U-Boot :-)
Regards,
Jonas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists