[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fa434d7f-b34e-43d9-987a-d3948305166a@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 08:28:01 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: George Moussalem <george.moussalem@...look.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
andersson@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, conor+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, lumag@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org,
konradybcio@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, quic_nsekar@...cinc.com, robh@...nel.org,
robimarko@...il.com, vkoul@...nel.org, quic_srichara@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add IPQ5018 SoC
On 17/03/2025 06:49, George Moussalem wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks Krzysztof. I did reorder them deliberately based on unit
>>> addresses as discussed also in other threads about IPQ9574 and IPQ5332
>>> as I thought it would be neater that way. I'll change it back, reuse
>>
>> Which discusses were that? What were the reasons to start with parf?
>>
>
> I based the reordering on this patch so assumed that was the direction
> (at that time):
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20250128062708.573662-5-quic_varada@quicinc.com/
That's a patch, not a discussion. I don't think anyone suggested
changing order or starting with 'parf' entry.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists