[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<DS7PR19MB8883AB849DC21D7C43DDA78A9DDF2@DS7PR19MB8883.namprd19.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 09:49:08 +0400
From: George Moussalem <george.moussalem@...look.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org,
andersson@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com, conor+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, lumag@...nel.org, kishon@...nel.org,
konradybcio@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de, quic_nsekar@...cinc.com, robh@...nel.org,
robimarko@...il.com, vkoul@...nel.org, quic_srichara@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/6] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Add IPQ5018 SoC
On 3/14/25 13:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 14/03/2025 09:42, George Moussalem wrote:
>>>> + reg-names:
>>>> + items:
>>>> + - const: parf # Qualcomm specific registers
>>>> + - const: dbi # DesignWare PCIe registers
>>>> + - const: elbi # External local bus interface registers
>>>> + - const: atu # ATU address space
>>>> + - const: config # PCIe configuration space
>>>
>>> Keep the same order as other IPQ, so dbi+elbi+atu+parf+config. Same for
>>> everything else, so standard rule applies: devices are supposed to use
>>> ordering from existing variants.
>>>
>>> There is some huge mess with IPQ PCI bindings, including things on the
>>> list. Apparently it became my job to oversee Qualcomm PCI work... well,
>>> I do not have time for that, so rather I expect contributors to
>>> cooperate in this matter.
>>>
>>> Don't throw your patches over the wall.
>>>
>>> If you need to rework the patch, take the ownership and rework it.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Thanks Krzysztof. I did reorder them deliberately based on unit
>> addresses as discussed also in other threads about IPQ9574 and IPQ5332
>> as I thought it would be neater that way. I'll change it back, reuse
>
> Which discusses were that? What were the reasons to start with parf?
>
I based the reordering on this patch so assumed that was the direction
(at that time):
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pci/patch/20250128062708.573662-5-quic_varada@quicinc.com/
This was then reverted in subsequent version so will reorder as suggested.
>
>> other sections in the dt as much as possible, and follow your guidance
>> instead.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
Best regards,
George
Powered by blists - more mailing lists